A journal must always have
In the case of a Finnish, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, the publisher should apply for permission to use the label to mark the peer-reviewed articles in the journal. There are public criteria for using that label and an external body (TSV) gives approval when the criteria are met.
The editorial staff/board of a peer-reviewed journal must consist of academically competent members from several research organizations. The reviewers must not be from the same organization as the author(s) and they must not have co-published with the author(s).
The peer-reviewing process must always be carried out in writing. Furthermore, regarding the process and any rejected material, all the correspondence, evaluation statements, author responses, article versions, etc. must be stored to ensure the validity of the review and the legal protection of the authors. Peer reviewing must always involve the possibility to reject a manuscript if it does not meet the prescribed criteria.
An individual university, faculty, institute, etc. should not be used as a scientific publisher. To qualify, the publisher must be e.g. a scholarly society, publishing house, a consortium of several organizations, or a publisher sufficiently independent of an individual research organization.
A peer-reviewed journal must strive to list its articles in one or several databases from which people typically search for scholarly articles: Finnish journals in the Arto database and English journals in international databases.
If a journal is published as a web publication
The Federation of Finnish Learned Societies is keeping up a system for publishing electronic journals. The service can be used for a small fee even by other scientific publishers than the scientific societies.
Lapland University Consortium Library
|
Interlibrary Loan Request |